- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Rob4Hope wrote:
[ I did some checking, looked her in the eyeballs actually and asked her point blank, and she was quite certain that the doctrine, from the graduate class she attended at BYU, traced the source to a footnote in an instructors manual at the CES level. That was the first occurrence found, with nothing they could find proceeding it. It appeared to have been a rumored folklore idea, like you suggested HG, that spread and become doctrinal (in the culture anyway).
First occurrence of what? That we believe in the Mother in Heaven? Or that we don’t talk about her because God wants to protect her? Or something else? I’m confused (which isn’t hard to do)
Sheldon wrote:Rob4Hope wrote:[ I did some checking, looked her in the eyeballs actually and asked her point blank, and she was quite certain that the doctrine, from the graduate class she attended at BYU, traced the source to a footnote in an instructors manual at the CES level. That was the first occurrence found, with nothing they could find proceeding it. It appeared to have been a rumored folklore idea, like you suggested HG, that spread and become doctrinal (in the culture anyway).
First occurrence of what? That we believe in the Mother in Heaven? Or that we don’t talk about her because God wants to protect her? Or something else? I’m confused (which isn’t hard to do)
The first occurrence of why we don’t talk about her, because God protects her and doesn’t want her talked about at all out of respect. That kindof idea is what I was talking about.
Retroactive justifications tend to be stupid. A footnote in a CES manual. I declare that to be NOT A SOURCE. At this point in my FC, CES is the least trustable of all sources
amateurparent wrote:A footnote in a CES manual. I declare that to be NOT A SOURCE.
At this point in my FC, CES is the least trustable of all sources
AP – I think you don’t know what CES stands for – Creates Extra Stress
LookingHard: CES = Creates Extra Stress.
You nailed it. Thank you!!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.