Home Page Forums History and Doctrine Discussions Promised Blessings

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #212506
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’ve noticed we always talk about receiving “promised blessings,” but rarely specify what those blessings actually are. Keeping the commandments, making and keeping temple covenants, paying tithing, going on a mission, etc. are supposed to qualify us for promised blessings.

    What blessings are we actually promised? Where are these promises from–scriptures, wording of ordinances, modern revelation? I feel like most of the talk about blessings is incredibly vague, and the few that are specific don’t quite work out (I live the WoW, but definitely get weary when I run).

    In short, can we actually have any concrete expectations? Is there a predictable cause-and-effect in the gospel?

    #335144
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Yes, I beleive there are. I beleive they are not financial and usually not tangible.

    #335145
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The more “amiguous” the promised blessings are, the more likely they are to happen in this life. If they throw around anything more concrete, it’s all about the next life, where no one can prove them wrong.

    In life, there are no concrete expectations you can have, only “hedging your bets” and “playing the odds”. What those odds actually are… well, that’s for you to determine, through evidence and experience.

    #335146
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Elder Renlund is addressing this exact topic in his talk.

    #335147
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    I really like the way Elder Renlund began in his talk about receiving blessings.

    I especially like that he stated explicitly we don’t receive blessings by frenetically racking up points with good works coupons.

    I also like that he tied everything into faith in Jesus Christ.

    “You don’t earn blessings.”

    “Our puny actions approach zero in the infinite pile, but they are not zero, and they are not insignificant.”

    I like that he specifically mentioned that Arizona is in North America. It is a little thing, but it is an important thing – and it says something about his recognition that not all members would know that.

    “The irrevocable law is time insensitive. If the desired blessing does not come soon, you do not need to drive yourself crazy wondering what more you can do.”

    I love this talk.

    This is one of the talks that I would like to read before opinionating too much. I am hopeful that it changes the conversation a little bit around the obedience = blessings model.

    It was the “promised blessings” that made my shelf collapse. When I really inspected with my priesthood leadership what blessings I had been promised I found that there was nothing – NOTHING – that I could bank on in a contractually enforcable way. Lots of hyperbole and puffery – no guarantees.

    I now realize that I saw religion as a way to control the uncontrolable. It was an extension of my deep seated desire to provide for and protect my family.

    #335148
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I just finished reading through Elder Renlund’s talk. I like how he specifies that we do not earn blessings.

    However, it still leaves me with questions.

    Quote:

    When you receive any blessing from God, you can conclude that you have complied with an eternal law governing reception of that blessing. But remember that the “irrevocably decreed” law is time insensitive, meaning blessings come on God’s timetable. Even ancient prophets in search of their heavenly home “died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off … [and] were persuaded … and embraced them.” If a desired blessing from God has not been received—yet—you do not need to go crazy, wondering what more you need to do. Instead, heed Joseph Smith’s counsel to “cheerfully do all things that lie in [your] power; and then … stand still, with the utmost assurance, to see the … arm [of God] … revealed.” Some blessings are reserved for later, even for the most valiant of God’s children.

    So when we receive blessings, we know we obeyed a certain law — is there a way to know which law that blessing is tied to?

    And if you don’t receive blessings, it doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t follow the law. The blessing might come later. I hope this leads to less judgement thinking people who lack some blessing must be unworthy, like when missionaries are told they would have had a better experience if only they were more obedient.

    Quote:

    I invite you to faithfully activate heavenly power to receive specific blessings from God.

    I feel like I still have no idea what these “specific blessings” are.

    So we don’t earn blessings, we just exercise faith to qualify for blessings, which may not come for a long time. I struggle with the idea of God’s timing. I suppose what I really want is for blessings, and answers to prayer, to be a sort of indication that God is actually there, that the commandments are actually of God and not of man. I want some sort of testable hypothesis to find out what is true, if what I’m doing is right. But the “God’s way, God’s timing” idea makes it so nothing is predictable or testable.

    I guess this is where faith comes in, but it’s a struggle.

    #335149
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Wonderful topic! From what I understand, there are laws that govern the distribution of blessings. In most cases we don’t know what these laws are, but in some cases we do. I look at blessings as miracles. A miracle is when God interferes in human history. A blessing is a positive miracle (hopefully). Moroni gives us the laws that govern answers to prayers. We must 1) pray to God 2) with a pure heart and 3) real intent in 4) the name of his son after 5) we receive these things.

    I have had some experience helping people overcome sexual abuse, and there are laws that govern that as well. I didn’t know how to do it at first, so I relied heavily on the Holy Ghost to teach me.

    There seems to be laws regarding the winning of contests. Learning to have gratitude is a big part of it. You’d be surprised how many contests I have won.

    There are laws governing the reception of revelation. I won’t go over them here, but suffice it to say the Joseph Smith’s first vision is a great example.

    Attitudes seem to be connected to every blessing; master the attitude and receive the blessing.

    #335150
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I read this talk now in entirety and I am disappointed.

    I do believe that hard work and thankfulness tend to yield better results than the opposite of laziness and entitlement.

    This is where I believe that Elder Renlund and I part ways. I feel that he spends much of his talk trying to make the case that we can secure divine and possibly miraculous intervention for ourselves if we do our part.

    Arrakeen wrote:


    I struggle with the idea of God’s timing

    I feel that he introduces the concept of God’s timing as a way to forestall criticism in case it doesn’t work. I work in casinos. Suppose I tell you that when you put your money into a slot machine it will bless you by multiplying your money greatly (“Gotta play to win!”). If you follow my advice then you are likely to be disappointed. However, if I tell you that the promised pay out will only come at the will and timing of the slot machine then you may continue to feed the machine through long periods of losing streaks until you eventually find fulfillment of the promise. If I tell you that the promised payout may not even occur in this life, but if not then surely in the next, then there is no way to test my promise. If the machine pays out, my promise was true. If the machine never pays out, then my promise was still true but only for the next life.

    Arrakeen wrote:


    I want some sort of testable hypothesis to find out what is true, if what I’m doing is right. But the “God’s way, God’s timing” idea makes it so nothing is predictable or testable.


    Yes, I understand this keenly

    What I wish we could do is get out of the business of promising “specific blessings”.

    As in, “God has a plan for your life and can make all of the garbage and loss and bad stuff work for his masterpiece at the end. That does not mean that God needed the bad stuff – He can also work with good stuff. Whatever happens he can and will use it towards his purposes.

    The promised blessings that we can rely on are only to be found in heaven. God will wipe all our tears, right all of our wrongs, and grant us eternal joy but this will only be found in heaven.”

    This for me would still acomplish the same goal of encouraging acts of faith and rightious living without what seems to me to be the somewhat deceptive “moving of the goal posts”.

    #335151
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Arrakeen wrote:


    I feel like I still have no idea what these “specific blessings” are.

    It’s very “broad” isn’t it? Like someone could say, “I didn’t mean those specific blessings!”

    Arrakeen wrote:


    But remember that the “irrevocably decreed” law is time insensitive, meaning blessings come on God’s timetable.

    I intepret this a bit differently. If there is a God, the laws transcend him. Good is still good, bad is still bad, the laws of nature, physics, and the universe will all continue to function regardless of what God or anyone else has to say about it. If God acts, it’s within the confines of those laws; if he causes a miracle to occur, it’d be through applied knowledge, not magic. If you want to be healthy, don’t smoke, stay away from sugar and exercise more. That’s a law. Except you might get run over by a truck, which is also another law. Even better… laws don’t require “correctness of belief”, or “faith” to apply.

    I once heard prayer isn’t meant to change the “will of God”, but to change us to accept the “will of God”. Not that I like that term, but it helps for some people. An analogy I like better, is that life’s a bit like being stuck in the middle of the ocean. You flail you arms around hoping for something, anything to grab onto. But you can’t grasp water. There’s nothing to hold. And if you keep flailing your arms around, you’ll exhaust youself and drown. But if you can calm yourself, trust yourself to the “water”, and lean back into it, you’ll float.

    #335152
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My whole issue with the idea of blessings is that they are so nebulous. I haven’t figured out what a blessing is or what a blessing is supposed to be. I can’t look at anyone else and say I think I am more blessed than they are or that they are more blessed than I am. Kind of along the same lines as what Dande is saying, I don’t know if people are really blessed or things just happen. I believe the idea of there being no coincidences is pseudo-doctrine. I think everything is a coincidence, although I also believe it is possible that some coincidences are foreseen (but not necessarily specifically planned). That’s mostly the deist in me. The only thing I think I know about blessings is that they are nor temporal and that the belief they are temporal is a general misunderstanding – but since I already admitted I don’t know what they are that sentiment is probably not worth the time it took me to type it.

    So Renlund’s talk was sort of a mixed bag for me, and honestly I think he contradicts himself. I have not re-listened to his talk but there were a couple times as he was speaking where I was saying “huh?” to myself. :problem: I suppose from Renlund’s point of view I don’t know what blessings are because I am not blessed and I am not blessed because of my own lack of faith. I freely admit I lack faith from some points of view.

    #335153
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I also really had a bad reaction to the story about the Arizona desert explorer-settlers. They nearly die and then they receive a miracle of rain that they use to get back to safety. BY seems to teach that they should have used the miracle of rain to travel further into the waste and then ask God for the next miracle. Huh? “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.”

    #335154
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:


    I also really had a bad reaction to the story about the Arizona desert explorer-settlers. They nearly die and then they receive a miracle of rain that they use to get back to safety. BY seems to teach that they should have used the miracle of rain to travel further into the waste and then ask God for the next miracle. Huh? “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.”

    Lol, Brigham Young had lots of revelations asking other people to do hard things.

    Reminded me of back on my mission, we had a couple of sisters who ran out of gas and were stranded on the road. They had all the faith in the world. They said a prayer, and poured bottled water into the gas tank, fully expecting it to turn into gasoline. I have no doubt they were filled with the Spirit. It completely destroyed their engine, hindered the work, and set the Church back five figs.

    God bless them, no judgement. They meant well, and according to their knowledge and experience, were absolutely certain it would work. But the idea that we can expect miracles, even when we’re “feeling it”, even when we need it to carry on “God’s work”, is a dangerous one. I guess you could say those sisters didn’t really “need” that miracle; but then again, people don’t “need” not to go to bed hungry, or “need” to recover from a terrible illness, or “need” not to get raped. Heck, you don’t even “need” to stay alive and sane. The word “need” only makes sense if there’s a qualifier, and if that qualifier is “… according to God’s plan”, i.e. “whatever happens”, you can’t (and shouldn’t) expect much.

    #335155
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I would love to hear the rest of the story from the viewpoint of the Sister Missionaries.

    What would they say?

    #335156
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Minyan Man wrote:


    I would love to hear the rest of the story from the viewpoint of the Sister Missionaries.

    What would they say?

    I imagine they beat themselves up pretty bad over it. “Not enough faith”, or “How could I be so stupid!”. Not that I agree with that assessment; we should be kind to ourselves. But in Church, we’re often taught, when things go well, it’s the providence of God. When things go wrong, it’s all our fault.

    #335157
    Anonymous
    Guest

    dande48 wrote:


    Minyan Man wrote:


    I would love to hear the rest of the story from the viewpoint of the Sister Missionaries.

    What would they say?

    I imagine they beat themselves up pretty bad over it. “Not enough faith”, or “How could I be so stupid!”. Not that I agree with that assessment; we should be kind to ourselves. But in Church, we’re often taught, when things go well, it’s the providence of God. When things go wrong, it’s all our fault.

    This harmed a lot of my testimony while I served my mission. I started to blame my own lack of faith or obedience for the actions my companions would take. If an investigator declined baptism, stopped reading the book of mormon or other such thing, I’d blame myself. I’ve been trying to figure out where and how I emotionally became tangled up in this mess of my fault for other’s choices, and I realized some quotes we read on the mission and were told were inspired for us may have caused them.

    “I frequently say to missionaries in the field, ‘You make or break your mission every morning of your life. You tell me how those morning hours go from 6:30 a.m. until you are on the street in your mission, whatever time it is; you tell me how those hours go, and I will tell you how your day will go, I will tell you how your month will go, I will tell you how your year will go and how your mission and your life will go’” (Elder Jeffrey R. Holland of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, seminar for new mission presidents, June 26, 2011).

    This, coupled with so many other apostles advising on obedience brings blessings and it’s no wonder I’ve convinced myself if I’m not obedience and live up to the standards I’ve covenanted to, anything that happens against my hope is my fault.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.