Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › Section 132
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 16, 2014 at 10:09 pm #292818
Anonymous
GuestDecember 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm #292819Anonymous
GuestQuote:hawkgrrrl wrote:
Holy Cow – funny thing, when pressed for details about Joseph Smith’s polygamy, the church deferred to Todd Compton who wrote In Sacred Loneliness.
Quote:Sheldon wrote:
Yes, they reference Todd’s book, but they don’t like it, as they won’t run advertisements for it in the Deseret News
My vindictive heart just sings with this.
😈 December 16, 2014 at 10:53 pm #292820Anonymous
Guestmom3 wrote:Quote:I miss my blissful days of blind “testimony”. It was easier not to wonder these things.
Very often I am right there with you.
Amen.
December 17, 2014 at 12:09 am #292821Anonymous
GuestQuote:OTOH, the COC has not seemed to grow much since then.
I have a question — does it matter if it doesn’t grow? Aren’t we in the truth business? And given the sacrifices our religion requires of its members, should it not adhere to the truth in spite of ensuing lack of grown, and organizational loss? If the answer to this question is “no”, doesn’t it mean the LDS church is no different than any other wordly organization?
December 17, 2014 at 12:41 am #292822Anonymous
GuestIf you are against polygamy you are in a bind if you believe the church is true. If Joseph did practice it you have a prophet doing things not of God yet claiming they are. If Joseph did not practice it then the church went astray with Brigham. So either you have a fallen prophet or a church lost in the wilderness. Very hard to make sense out of the practice. No wonder you have all those fundamentalist offshoot religions adhering to polygamy. At least they are consistent. Dangerously so but consistent
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
December 17, 2014 at 1:16 am #292823Anonymous
GuestYep – with some meanings of “true”. At the very least, it can force re-evaluation of meaning – and that is a very good thing, in the end. December 17, 2014 at 1:39 pm #292824Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:Quote:OTOH, the COC has not seemed to grow much since then.
I have a question — does it matter if it doesn’t grow? Aren’t we in the truth business? And given the sacrifices our religion requires of its members, should it not adhere to the truth in spite of ensuing lack of grown, and organizational loss? If the answer to this question is “no”, doesn’t it mean the LDS church is no different than any other wordly organization?
Good point, SD. I actually admire my Jewish friends. They believe they have truth, and they do. But it’s none of their concern whether anyone else does – they’re fine with allowing others to believe what they believe. I think they truly espouse AoF 11.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.