Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Stansbury High Homecoming Spirit Massacre
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 2, 2012 at 12:24 am #207098
Anonymous
GuestAdd another chapter to the Book “1001 Reasons I’m Glad I Don’t Live in Utah.” 😡 http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865563531/New-dance-planned-after-short-dresses-kept-many-from-Stansbury-High-homecoming.html ” class=”bbcode_url”> http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865563531/New-dance-planned-after-short-dresses-kept-many-from-Stansbury-High-homecoming.html October 2, 2012 at 12:29 am #260370Anonymous
Guestfreakin’ stupid. October 2, 2012 at 1:58 am #260371Anonymous
GuestKumahito wrote:Add another chapter to the Book “1001 Reasons I’m Glad I Don’t Live in Utah.”
😡 +1
The next chapter will be made of all the people’s reactions on websites…
Well the girl in the white dress is showing cleavage, and the girl in blue has bare shoulders, etc.I am not only amazed that this happened, but at how many people are agreeing with it. October 2, 2012 at 7:13 am #260372Anonymous
Guestwhat wayfarer said. *sigh* October 2, 2012 at 1:49 pm #260373Anonymous
GuestToo bad the principal apologized afterthe damage had been done. That’s what happens when people uphold the rules, and you have stupid-ass rules.
October 2, 2012 at 3:51 pm #260374Anonymous
GuestAs much as I agree, I see this as an exercise in learning for the leaders, so in that sense it has value. October 2, 2012 at 5:01 pm #260375Anonymous
GuestI found it interesting that for the sake of clarity the policy was actually made more stringent after the event. Before it read that dresses should reach near the knee and the new policy will read that dresses must reach beyond the knee. As far as landmarks go, the knee is pretty clear and the alternative would be something in the form of “within 3 inches of the knee” – but I think it is ironic that the actual policy is now becoming more stringent.
:crazy: October 2, 2012 at 5:49 pm #260376Anonymous
GuestI noticed the same thing. I think it was meant to take the judgment out of it, and potentially, to save face — that the policy wasn’t a problem, it was the description. October 2, 2012 at 6:38 pm #260377Anonymous
GuestRoy wrote:Before it read that dresses should reach near the knee and the new policy will read that dresses must reach beyond the knee.
Really? Unbelievable. Next they will want all the boys to wear white shirts.
October 2, 2012 at 7:07 pm #260378Anonymous
GuestAll that I can say is that Tooele is a very strange place. October 2, 2012 at 7:40 pm #260379Anonymous
GuestQuote:All that I can say is that Tooele is a very strange place.
I’ve been there, and I agree. It’s isolated geographically as much as any Utah city, and that alone breeds extremism naturally. Seriously, nobody in their right mind would choose to live there unless their job demanded it. The area is flat-out ugly; its picture probably is in some dictionary to show the meaning of “desolation”.
October 2, 2012 at 7:54 pm #260380Anonymous
GuestOld-Timer wrote:Quote:All that I can say is that Tooele is a very strange place.
I’ve been there, and I agree. It’s isolated geographically as much as any Utah city, and that alone breeds extremism naturally. Seriously, nobody in their right mind would choose to live there unless their job demanded it. The area is falt-out ugly; its picture probably is in some dictionary to show the meaning of “desolation”.
yeah, my daughter had an offer to teach school there…she said, “no thanks”. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.