Home Page Forums Support the church history

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #208837
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Does anyone read about it? How does it set with you? I’m feeling a bit betrayed.. it has some prettt dark things in my opinion and general authority writes it off as we aren’t perfect? I’m feeling quite confused and lied to about how inspired our church really is. Have any of you here struggled with this? Any advice other than pray about it?

    #285214
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Most, if not all, of us here have at least some questions about church history. For some it’s the main issue, for others it’s less important. I fall in the latter group. I do agree with the church leaders who excuse some of it as human error or foible, however I also believe there is stuff that was just plain made up, wrong, etc. Since I don’t believe most prayers are answered, praying about it is a non-answer for me. Like other things, we all need to come to our own middle way on history. One of the questions I ask myself is how whatever it is affects the gospel. Does it change our doctrine? If not it’s can be ignored completely. If so, I evaluate the doctrine and see where I stand on it. Others have different approaches and I’m sure they will contribute.

    #285215
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I fall into the former group that DJ references — the history for me was/is a BIG deal and the primary source of my faith crisis. Let me explain why though since it has little to do with the actual history itself. In my situation it was more about the deception (intentional or not) that went along with the church’s official version of its history.

    Honesty and integrity have played a very important part of my life and the emotions that I experienced when I learned of the truth made me feel very violated (I’ve included a link to my introduction earlier this year where you can get the gory details). I would have much preferred hearing that Joseph had a “spiritual experience” in the grove and that by some accounts it was “this” or others, “that” rather than the black and white version offered as the complete truth.

    Now, as far as where I have landed… I am more prayerful about what I read and hear. This has helped me, so I am one of the ones who would advocate for that type of approach. I draw on the Spirit to let me know what I hear from the church leadership is what I should be following or not, so I feel it has helped me align more to live the true gospel and a Christ-like life. It has been liberating for me and a positive step, though I am sure that TBMs would beg to differ. I know I ruffled a few feathers with some of my comments in High Priests last Sunday on lesson 10 from the Joseph Fielding Smith manual about truth. :thumbup:

    #285216
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I guess with how pure I was under the impression that it was.. I feel like its made up now and our current leaders have just become perfected in their speech.. if that makes sense? One part of me trusts todays leaders but another part of me feels silly and lied to. I have fears of turning away because of temple covenants but I fear staying because from facts I’ve read I don’t feel truth. Going to church every sunday only stresses me out and I feel guilty missing because than everyone wan ts to know what’s going on.

    #285217
    Anonymous
    Guest

    NewLight.. what are your thoughts on earning your salvation through works and not faith? I never realized our church focuses alot on that which is something surfacing for me.. isn’t that why Jesus was sent? To atone for oir sins? We will never be peefect so why do we try so hard to be and why are learning symbolic gestures keys into heaven? I’m a little baffled.

    #285218
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think it’s important to analyze why we got to where we are with church history. Here’s a few thoughts that occur to me, they are all opinion:

    I believe people are imperfect, very imperfect. The characters in church history are no different from you and me in that regard. I like to imagine just how bad I would goof things up if I were placed in similar circumstances.

    Without naming names some time ago church leaders decided it was best to only present the faith promoting side of church history. I believe that they did this with the best of intentions. I’m guessing that they felt like including the foibles in the narrative might cause some people to be led astray, impede the process of developing a testimony in important events pertaining to the restoration due to the imperfections of the people participating in said events, then there’s de mortuis nil nisi bonum (culturally we only talk about the good aspects of the deceased), or some similar justification. Let’s also not forget that some leaders may not be up to date on the latest version of church history, they simply parrot the version of history that they know.

    Unfortunately this decision robbed us of something very important, the human element. I think it’s helpful to see people struggle. Why? If these important figures in church history struggled then it’s okay for me to struggle too. It’s also an example. They make a connection with deity despite their shortcomings, perhaps I can use their example to do likewise. I think (lots of “I think” in this post) that the decision also created an environment where it’s easier to idolize people, imperfect people. That’s just a setup for disillusionment.

    Some may look at the situation and see a deliberate attempt by leadership to hide truth out of fear. Fear that leadership will lose power or control, fear that the authority of their office will be diminished, or fear that the truth will make people run for the hills. They might not be incorrect in this assumption.

    I view the situation as mostly being the result of mistakes made by imperfect leaders with good intentions; imperfect leaders with good intentions in the more recent past controlling the story of other imperfect leaders with good intentions in the distant past. I believe that some of the issue is the result of imperfect leaders with selfish intentions but I view it as the lesser contributor.

    BTW, I can see the ship turning. Maybe the leaders see the bad fruits of telling a whitewashed version of history, maybe they’ve got their backs against the wall. Either way I see a more positive direction. It will take time to bear fruit.

    #285219
    Anonymous
    Guest

    keepswimmin wrote:

    NewLight.. what are your thoughts on earning your salvation through works and not faith? I never realized our church focuses alot on that which is something surfacing for me.. isn’t that why Jesus was sent? To atone for oir sins? We will never be peefect so why do we try so hard to be and why are learning symbolic gestures keys into heaven? I’m a little baffled.

    I know you asked this, but this is the type of stuff I tend to have more issues with than history. These questions are historical only in how they got to be doctrine of the church.

    I do wholeheartedly believe that we must live the second great commandment and that is the work we must do. I do not believe that those works gain us salvation, though, I believe salvation was earned and given to us by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ – and that is the thing I must do to to be saved, believe in him and believe him. I do believe some church teachings focus too heavily on the works part (keeping the commandments, especially) and too little on the grace part. I actually believe “be ye therefore perfect” as a statement of something that will happen (through Christ) as opposed to a commandment. While I do believe it is important to do good, I think that attempting perfection is futile and only causes us guilt and stress as opposed to the joy we find in sincere service. I firmly believe that all of the symbolism, from baptism through the temple, is for us only and is nothing more than symbols and I think none of the symbolism is required to enter into heaven.

    #285220
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Just keep swimming,

    I recognize the feelings you may be having. I say feel them. There is a whole spectrum of feelings I went threw when finding this stuff out. I eventually came full circle. I have tried not to let these issues of the church or people harden my heart.

    Please do not stay or leave or do any thing in fear. Do not feel fear because of your temple covenants. Let me make an analogy. Lets say you went and bought a used car from a car dealership (or new car). The dealer gave you a lot of promises and assurances that the car was what he said it was. He said it was reliable, it was in excellent condition. After feeling good about it you signed a contract to pay for the car. Then after driving the car off the lot you discovered the car to be a lemon. The engine gave out or it just wouldn’t take you from point A to point B. Are you obligated to the contract you signed with the dealer? Please don’t feel obligated to keep sitting in a car that does not work for you. Now, if you choose to keep the car, I recommend an over haul on the engine. Witch I have done and continue to do.

    #285221
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thank you all for your answers.. I have a strong believe for a mother so I’ve nevee questioned it and now my sisters left and believes its a bunch of crap so I have been faced (which I’m learning has been to my benefit) confliction in mt beliefs and what is the truth of god and jesus.. I am realizing I took the meat before the milk.. I wanted to be the picture perfect mormon and let what members thought become the God I was worshipping.. I was so caught up trying to be perfect in my actions and picture that I wasn’t focusing on gaining knowledge of the gospel and my relationship with christ. With this being said I have felt the spirit too often within gener conference and teachings of the gospel. I don’t understand or even trust in all doctrine yet but I don’t need to. I’m realizing I need to work on my relationship with my heavenly father and gain trust in him and follow his holy spirit in my guidance and knowledge. I need to quit letting the letter of the law and the opinions of other define my worthiness to God. As long as I am at peace with him, no one can make that judgement upon me. With that being said I have ALOTof learning to do I have A LOT of praying to do and I need to discover where I stand as far as temporal things are, I have no testiminy of the WoW I have no testimony of the garment and I’m not even 100% sure I trust that joseph smith was a prophet. But I do know I trust God and I trust the spirit he has had me feel during conferences and studies so I’m going to trust him. I feel that I may need to surrender my TR until I have more confidence in living worthily and feel worthy within myself to confidently say I am worthy to attend. So I would like some advice as far as should I just not use my recommend or should I take it to my bishop to surrendor and let him know I’m not against the church I just realize I have a lot to learn and gain a sure knowledge before i feel at peace with my recommend?

    #285222
    Anonymous
    Guest

    keepswimmin wrote:

    I’m realizing I need to work on my relationship with my heavenly father and gain trust in him and follow his holy spirit in my guidance and knowledge. I need to quit letting the letter of the law and the opinions of other define my worthiness to God. As long as I am at peace with him, no one can make that judgement upon me.

    There you go, my friend – you are on your way to separating the church and the gospel and it’s an important epiphany. You do not have to believe everything taught in the church to be an active member in good standing – you are the one who makes that decision.

    Were it me, I’d just let the recommend expire. There is little to be gained by going to your bishop, and likely you will lose more than you gain. There is a caveat to this – if you truly believe you have a very understanding bishop and if you truly believe he can help you, then go to him (but those bishops are rare).

    #285223
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The aspect of church history that bothers me most is the fact that many prophets claim things as “doctrine” straight from God. I’m much less afraid now to believe certain things were mistakes and were not inspired.

    #285224
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think I have a “rare” bishop.. him and his wife have been a blessing to my life and though they are TBM to the core I feel confide t he would be understanding and not do more than let me surrender. I kind of feel I need to be honest about it to not feel guilt if they see me without my garments. But I will pray and make that move slowly.

    #285225
    Anonymous
    Guest

    keepswimmin wrote:

    I think I have a “rare” bishop.. him and his wife have been a blessing to my life and though they are TBM to the core I feel confide t he would be understanding and not do more than let me surrender. I kind of feel I need to be honest about it to not feel guilt if they see me without my garments. But I will pray and make that move slowly.

    I hope so… unfortunately it would not be uncommon for a bishop to see these steps as signs of apostasy. It is also not uncommon in such cases for a bishop to become less interested in helping or understanding you and more interested in protecting the rest of the congregation FROM you.

    nibbler wrote:

    I view the situation as mostly being the result of mistakes made by imperfect leaders with good intentions; imperfect leaders with good intentions in the more recent past controlling the story of other imperfect leaders with good intentions in the distant past. I believe that some of the issue is the result of imperfect leaders with selfish intentions but I view it as the lesser contributor.

    I very much agree with Nibbler’s statement on this.

    keepswimmin wrote:

    NewLight.. what are your thoughts on earning your salvation through works and not faith? I never realized our church focuses alot on that which is something surfacing for me.. isn’t that why Jesus was sent? To atone for oir sins? We will never be peefect so why do we try so hard to be and why are learning symbolic gestures keys into heaven? I’m a little baffled.

    Unfortunately we are a lifestyle religion. We also tend to teach that the better you live the Mormon lifestyle the more acceptable you are to God and the higher your reward in the afterlife. I especially dislike how we as a group seem to have redefined “grace” to be the “enabling power” that helps us to better live the Mormon lifestyle. I have experienced flashes of Love and Grace that I choose to believe came from God. To diminish this grace to an enabling power would take the heart out of those experiences for me. I do not claim to have all the answers, but my experiences suggest that there are more possibilities than what I previously believed.

    Keep on swimmin’ :thumbup:

    #285226
    Anonymous
    Guest

    nibbler wrote:

    I think it’s important to analyze why we got to where we are with church history. Here’s a few thoughts that occur to me, they are all opinion:

    I believe people are imperfect, very imperfect. The characters in church history are no different from you and me in that regard. I like to imagine just how bad I would goof things up if I were placed in similar circumstances.

    Without naming names some time ago church leaders decided it was best to only present the faith promoting side of church history. I believe that they did this with the best of intentions. I’m guessing that they felt like including the foibles in the narrative might cause some people to be led astray, impede the process of developing a testimony in important events pertaining to the restoration due to the imperfections of the people participating in said events, then there’s de mortuis nil nisi bonum (culturally we only talk about the good aspects of the deceased), or some similar justification. Let’s also not forget that some leaders may not be up to date on the latest version of church history, they simply parrot the version of history that they know.

    Unfortunately this decision robbed us of something very important, the human element. I think it’s helpful to see people struggle. Why? If these important figures in church history struggled then it’s okay for me to struggle too. It’s also an example. They make a connection with deity despite their shortcomings, perhaps I can use their example to do likewise. I think (lots of “I think” in this post) that the decision also created an environment where it’s easier to idolize people, imperfect people. That’s just a setup for disillusionment.

    Some may look at the situation and see a deliberate attempt by leadership to hide truth out of fear. Fear that leadership will lose power or control, fear that the authority of their office will be diminished, or fear that the truth will make people run for the hills. They might not be incorrect in this assumption.

    I view the situation as mostly being the result of mistakes made by imperfect leaders with good intentions; imperfect leaders with good intentions in the more recent past controlling the story of other imperfect leaders with good intentions in the distant past. I believe that some of the issue is the result of imperfect leaders with selfish intentions but I view it as the lesser contributor.

    BTW, I can see the ship turning. Maybe the leaders see the bad fruits of telling a whitewashed version of history, maybe they’ve got their backs against the wall. Either way I see a more positive direction. It will take time to bear fruit.

    I agree with nibbler. All of it :)

    When I go for a job interview I always tell them about my best attributes and never my bad attributes (even when they ask a question like “what are your weaknesses”). They still find out my weaknesses later, but much later. I don’t think that makes me dishonest… just normal.

    #285227
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Just to add confusion. The history didn’t bother me. I come from a history oriented family, my brother became a High School history teacher, and we have a son who loves history because of that I learned early on that history is always revisionist. Depending on who is telling the story, what they desire to present, and the circumstances of the disclosure.

    For me it was more of scriptural or spiritual shock. The idea of “drinking down stream from no man” really hit home as a youth. I attended institute, education week, EFY, Women’s conference with full intent on getting the meat. Even at 18 while attending EFY I totally skipped the “dating and eternal mate classes”. My faith believed we had some special tunnel of truth, and our insights into scripture were accurate and so on. As I helped a spouse with his faith crisis, I found myself short changed in the spiritual/scriptural side of our faith. It’s too long to explain here my point is if faith crisis were only on history the problem could be sewn up. Its just not that simple.

    Good luck with your history processing.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.