Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › The Photo Alone is Worth a 1000 Words

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 3, 2015 at 5:12 am #209702
    Anonymous
    Guest

    http://www.sltrib.com/news/2360146-155/obama-in-utah-meeting-with-mormon” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.sltrib.com/news/2360146-155/obama-in-utah-meeting-with-mormon

    April 3, 2015 at 11:11 am #297359
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I like how you didn’t lead people, you dangled it out there and let people come up with their own 1000 words. Here’s the first picture I saw of that meeting. It showed up in my FB feed.

    [img]http://img.deseretnews.com/images/article/midres/1513265/1513265.jpg[/img]

    Two things immediately came to my mind. I guess I’ll dangle it out there and let everyone form their own thoughts as well. ;)

    April 3, 2015 at 11:53 am #297360
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I only came up with three words right off the bat.

    April 3, 2015 at 11:57 am #297361
    Anonymous
    Guest

    We’re going to have to share our words after everyone gets a clean look at the image. :?:

    April 3, 2015 at 12:35 pm #297362
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I might if I’m not trying to save my energy for General Conference. 😯

    April 3, 2015 at 6:04 pm #297363
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Here were my top 3 meme’s

    1- Fraternizing with the enemy

    2-What would Glenn Beck Think?

    3-One of these things is not like the others. You guess? (skin color doesn’t count)

    April 3, 2015 at 6:08 pm #297364
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I don’t see the governor. I wonder how they picked which of the 1st presidency and Q12 would meet with him. They are all smiling – perhaps Obama is a human after all.

    April 3, 2015 at 7:21 pm #297365
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Obviously missing are Monson and Packer. Perry is next in seniority, Uchtdorff and Eyring are counselors, but why Christofferson? He’s been talking in press conferences a lot lately, but is not high up in seniority. I think he may be the one who’s been pushing the softer on gay rights (perhaps because of his brother). So being more “liberal” may be why he was chosen?

    April 3, 2015 at 8:19 pm #297366
    Anonymous
    Guest

    journeygirl wrote:

    Obviously missing are Monson and Packer. Perry is next in seniority, Uchtdorff and Eyring are counselors, but why Christofferson? He’s been talking in press conferences a lot lately, but is not high up in seniority. I think he may be the one who’s been pushing the softer on gay rights (perhaps because of his brother). So being more “liberal” may be why he was chosen?


    I agree. Plus I think it is getting hard for Packer to get around these days.

    April 4, 2015 at 3:35 pm #297367
    Anonymous
    Guest

    There is nothing negative about this. Period.

    April 4, 2015 at 4:18 pm #297368
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Old-Timer wrote:

    There is nothing negative about this. Period.

    Hmmm… I don’t think anyone is saying otherwise.

    April 4, 2015 at 4:23 pm #297369
    Anonymous
    Guest

    nibbler wrote:

    Old-Timer wrote:

    There is nothing negative about this. Period.

    Hmmm… I don’t think anyone is saying otherwise.

    Indeed, the president has been known to snub others, even other world leaders. I see it as positive that he chose to meet with our church leaders who probably didn’t vote for him.

    April 4, 2015 at 4:28 pm #297370
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I didn’t mean to imply anyone was negative about it. Sorry if that seemed to be the case.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.